Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Engineering teams spend much of their incident response time investigating the problem and coordinating the response. Both tasks become harder when telemetry data lives in one place, deployment history is stored in another, and conversations unfold across chat channels and incident bridges. Responders often spend the first part of an incident rebuilding context before they can begin testing hypotheses and working toward resolution.

At Datadog, we want our developers to become better at using AI tools with the end goal of building quality software, faster, that generates real value. This includes not only the products and features that our customers use, but also the internal tools that help keep our workflows running smoothly behind the scenes.

For the last two years, enterprise AI strategy has largely focused on one thing: adoption. Organizations encouraged employees to experiment with ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini, and dozens of emerging AI tools in the hope that productivity gains would naturally follow. CIOs approved pilots, departments launched AI task forces, and leaders pushed teams to integrate AI into everyday work as quickly as possible. But the enterprise AI conversation is beginning to change.

This blog post is part of PagerDuty’s ongoing series on how we’re helping customers navigate their journey towards autonomous operations. Read on to learn about how AI Orchestrations builds towards this vision. “We should automate this.” Sound familiar? For many operations teams, that sentence never becomes action. Building event orchestration rules demands deep platform expertise, time no one has, and the ability to spot which patterns in your data actually matter.

This blog post is part of PagerDuty’s ongoing series on how we’re helping customers navigate their journey toward autonomous operations. Read on to learn about the PagerDuty agent app in GitHub (Early Access) and how it builds toward this vision. How many tabs do you have open right now? And how many more do you open the moment an incident hits? Context switching during incident response is one of the most persistent sources of toil in engineering.

The Agile software development lifecycle was designed to surface problems early, with short sprints, iterative testing, and continuous integration built on the premise that faster feedback loops produce better software. AI coding tools have changed the velocity equation across every phase of that loop, but the phases designed to catch failures are struggling to keep up because build speed and validation capacity have not accelerated at the same rate, and the gap between them is widening with every sprint.