Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

CLIs are more token-efficient than MCP. Or are they?

MCP servers have a reputation: they eat your context window. CLIs paired with skills, on the other hand, are more token efficient. But is this still true? I dropped all my MCP servers five months ago. Five months is a long time in AI land. When Anthropic came up with the concept of skills, many people stopped using MCP servers in favor of CLI tooling and skills.

New AI Features in Playwright (Live-Webinar)

An AI agent that can't open a browser is just guessing. Stefan from Checkly shows how giving AI coding agents a real browser via Playwright enables reliable end-to-end test generation and debugging, closing the quality gap created by faster, AI-driven shipping. The session compares Playwright MCP vs the Playwright CLI for agent workflows, showing that thanks to MCP spec changes, lazy tool loading, and skills, the two are now effectively just different interfaces to the same tool, with no real token advantage either way.

How Upstash Monitors Every Redis Replica with Checkly

There's a support ticket every SRE dreads: "is something wrong with my database?" The outage is bad enough. Worse is the possibility that the customer knew first. At Upstash, we treat that scenario as two failures rather than one: the incident itself, and the uptime monitoring gap that let a customer beat us to it. We write a postmortem for the gap, too.

Autoscaling Checkly Private Location Agents in Kubernetes with KEDA

Monitoring load is not always steady. A team might add a new batch of checks or run several ad hoc tests during a rollout. When that happens, your Private Location agents need to pick up more work at once. If there aren’t enough agents available during a burst, checks start piling up in the queue, which can delay or disrupt check execution. But solving this by running a high number of agents around the clock has the opposite problem: most of that capacity sits idle until the next busy period.