Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Prove Your SLAs: How Yext Ties Synthetic Monitoring to SLOs with Checkly (Live-Webinar)

Yext uses synthetic monitoring to prove and meet SLAs, by tying Checkly checks directly to SLOs and user-facing SLIs. Stefan (Developer Relations), Braxton (Solutions), and Shikhar (Engineering Productivity at Yext) cover the SLA/SLO/SLI basics, the math behind "all these nines", and how Yext turns those targets into concrete checks with monitoring as code.

We Let AI Agents Rewrite a 92M-Message-a-Day Service in Go. Zero Incidents.

Our Results Daemon processes about 92 million messages a day. We recently rewrote it from Node.js to Go, and we let Claude Code write it. We wanted to know whether we could trust an agentic rewrite for a critical, high-throughput production service rather than a prototype. It shipped with zero incidents, a 70% reduction in running pods, and a lighter database load.

Let AI Agents Own Your Monitoring: From Setup to Auto-Fixed Incidents

Your AI agent can set up your monitoring, report on platform health, and open a PR to fix a failing check. All this works automatically. In this webinar, Stefan (Developer Relations at Checkly, Google Developer Expert & Playwright Ambassador) demonstrates how Monitoring as Code makes Checkly agent-friendly by design, and walks through three agentic workflows live.

CLIs are more token-efficient than MCP. Or are they?

MCP servers have a reputation: they eat your context window. CLIs paired with skills, on the other hand, are more token efficient. But is this still true? I dropped all my MCP servers five months ago. Five months is a long time in AI land. When Anthropic came up with the concept of skills, many people stopped using MCP servers in favor of CLI tooling and skills.