Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

GitKraken Desktop in 6 Minutes: Open a Repo, Run an Agent, Ship the Change

The fastest way to get up and running in GitKraken Desktop. In this tutorial, you'll open a repo, start an AI coding agent in its own worktree, review the agent's changes against your own work, and ship a pull request without leaving the app. What you'll learn: Chapters Help Center: help.gitkraken.com.

Inclusive AI vs. centralized AI: Can India avoid big tech concentration?

At the 2026 India AI Impact Summit in February 2026, 92 countries and international organizations (including the US, China, and the UK) signed a preliminary agreement that positions AI as both a development tool and a shared global responsibility. “India will not be a mere consumer in the AI age. We will be the creators, the builders, and the exporters of intelligence and we are proud to be able to participate in that future.” Gautam Adani, chairman of the Adani Group.

Connecting Agents for Real-Time Root Cause Analysis with Checkly's Rocky AI

Rocky, Checkly's AI agent, monitors production sites and provides an analysis for every failing check. Previously, a coding agent couldn't access this analysis, leaving incidents and agents disconnected. Now, you can access all the analyses via the Checkly CLI (or API) and tell your coding agent, "Hey, I got a Checkly alert. Please investigate!" With Rocky's structured analysis delivered inline, the coding agent can start with a strong hypothesis, fix issues, and propose a PR in one session.

Why do you need incident alerting? (And why monitoring alone isn't enough)

Monitoring tools track what’s happening across your systems and send a Slack message or email when something looks off. But they don’t call anyone and they don’t escalate the incident. If that Slack message goes unseen at 3 AM on a Saturday, the incident just sits there until someone opens their dashboard. Incident alerting fills this gap. When an incident triggers, it contacts the right person directly through a phone call or their preferred channel.

Five questions your platform evaluation is missing

Years back I sat in on a platform evaluation with a customer who spent forty-five minutes of the meeting focusing on one thing: their custom PHP content management system. They had opinions about the CMS. Strong opinions. They had benchmarks, a migration plan, a proof of concept. They had a diagram. They had questions about the deployment pipeline for this CMS that were, for a single application, more thoroughly considered than most organizations' entire infrastructure strategies.

We're in a Patch Apocalypse. That Means These Three IT Excuses Won't Work Anymore.

On April 7, Anthropic announced that its Claude Mythos Preview model had autonomously identified thousands of high- and critical-severity zero-day vulnerabilities across every major operating system and every major web browser. Over 99% of them were unpatched the day of disclosure. Two weeks later, on April 21, Mozilla said it had used the same model to find and patch 271 vulnerabilities in the latest Firefox release.

From Vibes to Signals: Observing Your AI Coding Workflow

Agentic coding tools like Claude Code and Codex have taken centre stage and inserted themselves into the critical path of software development. This shift has happened fast, and for most teams, the visibility hasn’t caught up. Until now we’ve been evaluating our vibe coding the same way – on vibes. You might say “this feels faster” or “that seems like a better approach”. That’s not going to scale.

Infrastructure as Code Management: Terragrunt & Multi-IaC | Harness Blog

What happens when your Infrastructure as Code management strategy works perfectly in dev, scales reasonably well in staging, and then quietly fractures across seventeen production workspaces because nobody documented which Terragrunt wrapper goes with which AWS account? You spend Friday afternoon reverse-engineering DRY patterns that made sense six months ago, wondering why your team is managing three different IaC execution engines with four incompatible workflow philosophies.