Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

We Let AI Agents Rewrite a 92M-Message-a-Day Service in Go. Zero Incidents.

Our Results Daemon processes about 92 million messages a day. We recently rewrote it from Node.js to Go, and we let Claude Code write it. We wanted to know whether we could trust an agentic rewrite for a critical, high-throughput production service rather than a prototype. It shipped with zero incidents, a 70% reduction in running pods, and a lighter database load.

Let AI Agents Own Your Monitoring: From Setup to Auto-Fixed Incidents

Your AI agent can set up your monitoring, report on platform health, and open a PR to fix a failing check. All this works automatically. In this webinar, Stefan (Developer Relations at Checkly, Google Developer Expert & Playwright Ambassador) demonstrates how Monitoring as Code makes Checkly agent-friendly by design, and walks through three agentic workflows live.

CLIs are more token-efficient than MCP. Or are they?

MCP servers have a reputation: they eat your context window. CLIs paired with skills, on the other hand, are more token efficient. But is this still true? I dropped all my MCP servers five months ago. Five months is a long time in AI land. When Anthropic came up with the concept of skills, many people stopped using MCP servers in favor of CLI tooling and skills.

New AI Features in Playwright (Live-Webinar)

An AI agent that can't open a browser is just guessing. Stefan from Checkly shows how giving AI coding agents a real browser via Playwright enables reliable end-to-end test generation and debugging, closing the quality gap created by faster, AI-driven shipping. The session compares Playwright MCP vs the Playwright CLI for agent workflows, showing that thanks to MCP spec changes, lazy tool loading, and skills, the two are now effectively just different interfaces to the same tool, with no real token advantage either way.

How Upstash Monitors Every Redis Replica with Checkly

There's a support ticket every SRE dreads: "is something wrong with my database?" The outage is bad enough. Worse is the possibility that the customer knew first. At Upstash, we treat that scenario as two failures rather than one: the incident itself, and the uptime monitoring gap that let a customer beat us to it. We write a postmortem for the gap, too.