Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Workload management is ubiquitous when it comes to automating critical business processes. With time, workload management as a technology is going through a gradual evolution, from ‘just automation’ to an orchestrator of intelligent automation. This necessitates a layer of observability and intelligence to facilitate the move from workload automation to workload management.

As discussed in the first article in this series, a Center of Production Excellence (CoPE) is a more or less formal, provisional subsystem within an organization. Its purpose is to act from within to change that organization so that it’s more capable of achieving production excellence. The series has, to date, focused mainly on how best to construct such a subsystem and what activities it should pursue.

Maintaining and visualizing telemetry data efficiently is super important for DevOps and SecOps teams. OpenTelemetry, a fantastic open-source observability framework, can really help with this without being too costly. Picture having a simple process that improves your data and helps your team make smart decisions without spending too much money. Let's chat about some budget-friendly ways to set up OpenTelemetry agents.

In 2024, simply having an observability practice is a given. In this era of observability, a high-functioning team will set leaders apart from their peers. Leading observability practitioners don’t fix issues by putting hundreds of people into a virtual room, or frantically messaging in a temporary Slack channel to find root causes. Because leaders embed observability into their development practices early, a feature launch is a quiet non-event.

In a relatively short period of time, networks have grown much bigger, much more complex, and much more critical to the ongoing operation of the business. Quite simply, while ensuring optimized network services has never been more critical, it’s also never been more difficult. In many large enterprises, network operations teams are seeing tens of thousands of endpoints added to already complex internal environments.

Logs are a rich source of information, providing you with the minute details you need to troubleshoot a specific issue or perform extensive historical analysis. But with billions of logs being generated from your infrastructure every day, it isn’t practical to sift through them all to derive actionable insights. Firewall, CDN, network activity, and load balancer logs are especially high volume, requiring storage solutions that can be expensive and difficult to scale.

Let’s be real, we’ve never been huge fans of conventional unstructured logs at Honeycomb. From the very start, we’ve emitted from our own codestructured wide events and distributed traces with well-formed schemas. Fortunately (because it avoids reinventing the wheel) and unfortunately (because it doesn’t adhere to our standards for observability) for us, not all the software we run is written by us.

Generative AI has emerged as a powerful force for synthesizing new content—text, images, even music—with astounding proficiency. However, monitoring, optimizing, and maintaining the health of these complex AI systems is challenging, and traditional observability tools are struggling to keep pace. At Grafana Labs, we believe that every data point tells a story, and every story needs a capable narrator.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) tools play a critical role in ensuring seamless user experiences for businesses. While Dynatrace has established itself as a leader in this field, there exists a range of alternative solutions in the market that may align more closely with the specific needs of your organization. This comprehensive guide delves into the diverse competitors of Dynatrace, offering valuable insights to empower you in making a well-considered choice when procuring an APM solution.

You hear us at Percepio talking about Observability a lot. For customers using our award-winning Tracealyzer tool, this might sound a bit strange – isn’t Tracealyzer about diagnostics, debugging and profiling? Mostly, yes, but let me share why we are putting so much emphasis on our Continuous Observability solutions.