Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

When it comes to storing your files or photos online, the number of choices can be overwhelming. To make things more confusing, some services focus on cloud storage and photos, and others offer both, such as Google Photos and Google Drive. But what’s the difference? Although both appear to be the same, they have some differences based on whether you need photo or file storage. Both have advantages and features to meet your needs as a photographer or for general cloud storage.

I recently wrote about the impending SaaS crisis, driven by companies’ newfound ability to use AI to build software they used to have to buy. I predicted this phenomenon would make it even harder for SaaS vendors to drive growth, and that elite SaaS margins would fall from the mid-70s to the mid-60s as companies leaned more into their data and AI.

Downtime is brutally expensive and damaging. Enterprises can lose about $9,000 every minute systems are down, while smaller businesses lose hundreds of dollars per minute. A single outage can often cost over $100,000, and nearly a third of companies lose customers due to downtime. That’s why many organizations turn to platforms like SolarWinds to maintain reliable systems and minimize the risk of costly disruptions.

The benefits of observability are clear: deep visibility into system health, faster troubleshooting, and improved reliability (to name a few). But what’s equally clear is that, as organizations scale and evolve their observability strategies, they need a way to tap into these benefits without runaway costs. According to Grafana Labs’ 2025 Observability Survey, 74% of respondents say cost is a top priority for selecting tools.

From pipelines to warehouses, modern operations generate more distributed data than ever, with equipment and connected devices spread across factories, grids, and remote sites. A single, centralized historian can no longer handle this volume or distribution. Without change, organizations risk fragmented visibility, higher costs, and slower responses.

Today, we’re excited to announce the launch of Mezmo’s AI-powered Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) agent for root cause analysis (RCA)—a transformative leap forward for engineering and operations teams facing the relentless complexity of modern cloud-native systems. ‍

If you’re building high-performance systems, Golang has probably earned a spot in your stack. Its speed, lightweight concurrency, and quick compile times make it ideal for scalable APIs, microservices, and distributed systems. But those same qualities that make Go powerful can make performance monitoring tricky. Goroutines run fast and in parallel, which means a simple CPU or memory graph doesn’t always tell you what’s slowing things down.

From Microsoft Copilot to ChatGPT, AI applications are quickly becoming everyday workplace tools. But for many organizations, turning on these capabilities isn’t as simple as flipping a switch. Enterprise licenses for AI tools can cost millions, yet few companies can confidently say employees are using them effectively, or safely. The reality is that most AI rollouts start strong but stall fast.

I'll start this, the third and final entry in my series on APM and Observability, which was originally inspired by my contribution to an APMdigest article, by once again pointing out that APM tools can be built with observability in mind. Many are, in fact. And the ones that aren’t don’t turn into a different type of tool. In my experience, it's more that there's a difference of mindset.

Enterprises are prioritizing digital transformation and agility, yet most lack the structural readiness for what's next. When 95% of financial services professionals believe there's little to no risk in delaying system modernization, even as the UK's FCA issued over £319 million in fines for non-compliance in just six months, it's clear many are mistaking surface upgrades for true adaptability.