Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

A company burned $500M in Claude credits because nobody set a limit. Uber exhausted its 2026 AI budget. Microsoft canceled Claude Code licenses. The problem isn't AI - it's the total absence of governance around how people use it.

May has been one of our busiest months yet for Konstruct. Across three releases, 0.5, 0.5.1, and 0.5.2, we've shipped some of the most requested platform-level changes since we launched: a unified model for sharing resources across organizations, native support for AI-driven workflows via MCP, a completely redesigned API keys experience, and a cleanup to how permissions actually work in multi-org environments. Let's walk through what shipped and why it matters.

If you serve LLMs on Kubernetes without inference-aware routing, your load balancer is likely wasting inference capacity. Generic HTTP traffic management blindly routes requests, assuming the backends in your cluster are interchangeable. But your model-serving backends are stateful and unevenly prepared to handle any given request. As a result, requests are often routed to the backend that’s not the one best suited to respond.

When Anthropic broke the news of Mythos and Project Glasswing, the security community did what it always does. It published a flurry of papers asking "What does this mean for security?" It's a reasonable instinct, but it's the wrong question. The real question is who actually owns the problem?

With SRE AI, Google plans to fully adopt AI and agentic technologies, leveraging AI as a force multiplier while also maintaining control.