Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

I have an Upsun project that's nothing but proofs of concept. It's a dashboard, basically. Each POC gets its own tile. Click in, and you land on a page with three tabs. The first tab is a written explanation of what the POC argues. The second tab is the POC itself, with a built-in demo that automates a walkthrough of the feature so the recipient can watch it run without me on the call.

Two things shipped this week. One is for the MSPs who manage certificates on behalf of other companies. The other lets you run the shorter 45-day renewal cycle today.

One of the important offerings of the RISC-V Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) is the ability to customize and extend the base instruction set. An initial reaction to hearing this is often to worry about software portability and compatibility, since if every RISC-V CPU offers a slightly different set of instructions, software won’t be portable.

IBM Think 2026 made one thing clear: infrastructure leaders are being asked to support more AI, more automation, and faster decision-making without adding unnecessary complexity or risk. Held earlier this month in Boston, IBM Think 2026 focused heavily on enterprise AI, hybrid cloud, automation, governance, and operational transformation.

Here’s a problem I run into constantly: something breaks in production, I can see the 500 errors in my logs, but I can’t reproduce it locally. The trace shows me the dependency graph but not the actual request that failed. This is especially painful in microservices. I was looking at a CNCF example the other day (a simple demo app, like 4 pods) and it already had so many cross-service dependencies that understanding what broke required looking at the whole system at once.

I keep hearing the phrase "code is cheap." I don't know who came up with it. Whoever it was clearly has not seen an Anthropic bill. I get what they mean. The cost of writing a line of code has cratered, AI does most of the typing, you know the rest. Fine. But the phrase is combative in a way that doesn't help anyone, especially the engineers in the room. "Code is accessible" lands better. Less swagger, more honesty. Either way, here's the line my friend Guillaume gave me that finally cracked it open.