Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Engineering, operations, and security teams can struggle to make sense of their telemetry data in isolation. Logs, metrics, and events tell what is happening but are often missing critical metadata like who owns what, where it's coming from, or indicators of attack. These gaps in visibility slow down incident response, complicate cost control, and make business or security analytics much harder.

Organizations that run applications on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) often juggle signals across container and task metrics, logs, and events while they hunt for the change or condition that broke a deployment. This work adds operational overhead and extends incident timelines as teams switch between tools and manually correlate symptoms.

We recently released the 2025 State of Containers and Serverless report, which examines cloud usage data from tens of thousands of Datadog customers. The study shows adoption trends across container orchestration platforms and serverless offerings, and it explores how organizations use those resources to optimize workloads for efficiency, cost, and simplicity.

Security teams face a constant trade-off between detection coverage and alert fatigue. Broad, rule-based detection approaches surface every possible indicator of compromise (IoC) but generate unmanageable alert volumes. Narrow, tightly scoped rules reduce noise but risk missing critical signals. And while individual indicators of compromise can highlight suspicious behavior, they often lack the surrounding context needed to tell a complete story of how an attack unfolded.

In October’s episode of This Month in Datadog, Jeremy shows how you can use AI to query with natural language in DDSQL Editor, ensure teams stay continually updated during outages, mitigate the impact of flaky tests, and ingest OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP) metrics from serverless and third-party SaaS environments.

When an application slows down or fails, pinpointing the cause isn’t always simple. Is it a backend regression, a misbehaving API, or a bottleneck somewhere deep in the network? Without full visibility, teams waste precious time troubleshooting across disconnected tools and layers. Datadog Synthetic Monitoring now supports Network Path to help you proactively identify whether user-facing issues stem from your code or from the underlying network.

Getting started with monitoring for Microsoft Azure environments can be a lengthy and manual process. Many tools require users to create app registrations, assign permissions, and enable log forwarding or telemetry data collection across multiple portals and scripts. These fragmented steps slow down onboarding and introduce opportunities for misconfiguration, making it harder for teams to quickly achieve full visibility.

As AI workloads and cloud-native applications expand, organizations are generating more log data than ever. Each service, container, and model inference produces continuous telemetry that must be stored, secured, and analyzed. As telemetry grows more complex, teams must balance full visibility with new retention and residency needs.

Testing ecosystems contain massive amounts of data, including outlined test scenarios, prerequisite configurations, and the tests themselves. As a result, these ecosystems are prone to data sprawl. This makes it difficult to prevent configuration drift and quickly spin up new tests, especially at the frequency needed to support a fast-growing application. Teams can handle these challenges by treating their tests as part of their application infrastructure.

As AI workloads and cloud-native applications expand, organizations are generating more log data than ever. Each service, container, and model inference produces continuous telemetry that must be stored, secured, and analyzed. As telemetry grows more complex, teams must balance full visibility with new retention and residency needs.