Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Perplexity was a big name a few years ago. But, we haven’t heard much out of them lately. There are plenty of posts on social media criticizing Perplexity to that effect. One thing that the posts miss is that Perplexity is still the king of AI search. Google is giving it a run for its money with the AI previews on Google search, but Perplexity still wins out in several measurable ways.

Choosing a software engineering intelligence platform is one of those decisions that gets more complicated the longer you wait. The category has grown rapidly, and every vendor claims to track the metrics that matter. GitKraken Insights gives you a full-stack view of engineering performance, from DORA metrics to AI tool ROI, in a platform trusted by over 40 million developers. But it isn’t the only option on the market.

Your code review tool does more than display diffs. It shapes how your team shares knowledge, catches bugs, and ships software. With AI-generated code accelerating PR volume, choosing the right code review platform is a decision that directly affects your team’s velocity. GitKraken connects PR workflows, multi-repo management, and AI-assisted review into a single developer experience platform.

We hosted a live launch preview, “Level Up Your Agentic Workflow,” to introduce two things at once: GitKraken Insights for Developers and Kepler. Jeremy Castile, our VP of Developer Research, opened with research on how teams are actually using AI agents today. If you want the full breakdown of that data, including the adoption numbers and the gap between feeling faster and proving it, we published it separately in State of AI in Engineering 2026: The Proof Gap.

The biggest Kepler update since public preview is live. If you tried Kepler early, here’s what changed, and the problem it’s built to solve.

If you look at the people posting to social media the most about AI, you’ll probably feel left behind. They’re running dozens or hundreds of agents and probably shipping more than you. But, they are not representative of the rest of the dev world. They are the 1% of the 1%. The thing that might be missed is that you reading their posts is probably separating you from a much larger cohort of devs that are still trying to figure out how to use AI effectively in their day to day work.

What 554 developers and engineering leaders told us about AI, agents, and the measurement gap nobody’s closing. Ask a developer if AI made them faster this year, and 84% will say yes. Ask their VP to put a number on it for the board, and 39% will have nothing to show. That gap, not adoption, is the real story in engineering right now.

AI coding tools were supposed to mean developers work less. On a recent webinar recorded with LeadDev, senior engineering manager Vernon put words to something a lot of teams are quietly noticing instead: “It’s concerning because it’s the opposite of what was promised. We were supposed to be working less.”

Splitting one big pull request into five smaller ones doesn’t automatically make review faster. It just moves the complexity from the diff to your head, unless something keeps track of the order for you.

Most companies buy AI tools for developers and hope the impact shows up somewhere. A faster sprint. Fewer escaped bugs. Something. What they don’t have is a way to actually see it happening, which means adoption becomes a leap of faith instead of a measured bet. That’s the gap Kepler and GitKraken Insights close together, and it’s worth understanding as one story, not two separate product updates.