Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

If you spend most of your day in branches and pull requests, the platforms you pick decide how much friction you carry. The “version control platforms” label covers two different things: the hosting service where your code lives, and the client you use to interact with it locally. They both matter, and they don’t always pull in the same direction.

Merge conflicts waste hours of development time every week. The Git branching strategy you pick directly shapes how often these conflicts appear and how painful they are to fix. GitKraken simplifies conflict resolution with visual tools that help you spot problems before they become blockers. This guide walks you through a step-by-step decision process for selecting between GitFlow and trunk-based development.

Picking the right VS Code Git extension can shape how you move through your codebase every day. GitLens and Git Graph both add visual Git tools to your editor, but they take different paths to get there. GitLens gives you deep context about every line of code – who wrote it, when, and why. Git Graph focuses on visualizing your commit history in a branching timeline. This article breaks down each extension so you can decide which one fits your workflow.

Merge conflicts can bring a small team’s momentum to a grinding halt. You’re working on a feature, ready to push your changes, and suddenly Git throws up conflict markers that demand your attention. For smaller teams where everyone touches the same codebase, these interruptions stack up fast. This guide walks you through the root causes of frequent merge conflicts and gives you actionable tactics to prevent them.

Most teams use Jira to plan work and GitHub to build it. The problem is those two tools don’t talk to each other by default. Developers end up manually copying commit references into tickets, project managers hunt through GitHub to answer basic status questions, and sprint reviews become archaeology expeditions through two disconnected systems. Git Integration for Jira closes that gap.

Introducing GitKraken Desktop 12.0. At some point in the last year, the question shifted. It stopped being “should I use AI coding agents?” and became “how do I run more than one at a time without losing my mind?” If you’ve been there, you know what the management layer looks like. A terminal per agent. A worktree created by hand before each session.

There’s a version of the AI story that engineering leaders want to hear. It goes like this: adopt AI coding tools, watch output multiply, ship faster, do more with less. Clean. Simple. Boardroom-ready. The data tells a different story. Not a worse one. Just a more honest one. We recently analyzed 2,172 developer-weeks of real coding activity across teams using GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code. The headline numbers are striking: power users show 4-14x higher activity than non-users.

During International Women’s Month, we celebrate women whose technical work changed entire industries. But the lessons from engineers like Margaret Hamilton aren’t seasonal, they’re fundamental to how we should approach software development every single day. Margaret coined the term “software engineering” and built the code that landed humans on the moon. Her approach to rigor is as relevant to your next Git commit as it was to Apollo 11’s descent engine.

Seven developer-requested features. Tighter control over branches, history, and large repos. No CLI detours required. If you have been using GitKraken Desktop in a complex repo, you already know what it feels like when the commit graph turns into a wall of branches. When rebasing requires more ceremony than it should. When you just need one file back from three commits ago but have to orchestrate a whole checkout to get it. GitKraken Desktop 11.10 is built for those moments.

When we rolled out AI coding tools across our engineering team, the first few weeks felt great. Developers were enthusiastic. Acceptance rates looked healthy. Everyone said they felt more productive. Then my CEO asked me a simple question: “Is it working?” And I realized I didn’t have a good answer. Feeling productive and being productive are not the same thing.