Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Questions to Ask About AI Agent Orchestration

Running AI coding agents in parallel across repositories is no longer experimental. It’s how high-performing engineering teams ship faster. But the tools you pick to orchestrate those agents can either multiply your output or introduce new bottlenecks. GitKraken gives your team a purpose-built surface for AI coding agent orchestration through Kepler, its agent-agnostic development environment. Before you commit to any orchestration tool, though, you need to ask the right questions.

AI Code Review Loop in the Terminal: Introducing Harness CLI for Harness Code

Every developer knows the fatigue of the "12-tab code review dance": Agents have become first class citizens in SDLC and AI coding agents author code alongside human engineers, thus the above context switching destroys flow state. GitHub's gh CLI proved developers love the terminal, but modern delivery is tied to AI reviews, pipeline executions, risk scoring, and autonomous agents, not just git hosting.

SBOMs are easy for one project, monumental at scale

Think of an SBOM as your ingredient list. A common language describing everything that goes into a piece of software, every dependency and version, in one place. This video covers why SBOMs have gone from niche to mandatory, and why they're harder to pull off than the concept suggests: The concept is simple. Operationalizing it across a large, diverse tech stack is where it gets hard.

Using writable bind mounts with Icinga 2 in rootless Podman

Running Icinga 2 in a rootless Podman container is pretty straightforward, it works just the same as on Docker, so all the examples on our Docker Hub page work as expected. For example this one to generate certificates and initialize the master configuration: Same as with mounting some existing configuration into the container: But once you want to combine the two, for example to store the certificates on the host and mount them into the container, generating or renewing certificates will fail.

The Essential Eight: Patching Applications and Operating Systems at Maturity Level Two

Why do so many patching programs pass every internal check and still come back from an Essential Eight assessment rated at Maturity Level One? The answer is rarely speed. Teams that miss the mark are usually patching their servers, browsers, and office suites on schedule, then losing the rating on the fifty applications nobody put on a list. Maturity Level Two is where the Essential Eight stops asking how fast you patch and starts asking how much you can see.

MSP Ticketing System: How to Evaluate and Choose the Right Platform

Most managed service providers do not replace their ticketing tool because ticket volume got too high. They replace it because a client asked for a report the tool could not produce. That moment usually arrives between the third and tenth client. The shared inbox and the general help desk that carried you this far stop holding the accounts apart. Per-client reporting is usually the first thing to give way. An MSP ticketing system takes support requests from every client you serve.