Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

You can already split AI spend by team and by model. But that’s not what your CEO asks in the QBR. The question is what you got for it: what did it cost to ship that feature, to launch that campaign, to serve that customer. And is the AI bet behind it paying off? Now you can allocate AI spend to the outcomes you own: customer, product, feature, the strategic bet on the P&L. Not just the team that spent it.

The telco industry is undergoing a fundamental change. Over the past few years, the increasing maturity of cloud-native infrastructure has accelerated the movement from manually operated and hardware-centric systems to automated, software-defined platforms. Underpinning this change are open source initiatives such as the Sylva project. Sylva is hosted by Linux Foundation Europe and heavily backed by major telecom operators and vendors.

Your Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) server already knows what’s connected to your network. The problem is that DHCP data rarely stays aligned with the rest of your infrastructure systems. Instead, it becomes fragmented across Windows servers, branch offices, spreadsheets, and disconnected operational tools. Lease data ages, assignments go untracked, and teams lose confidence in their network inventory.

Claude Mythos is now available to the public through Claude Fable 5, released June 9, 2026. Claude Fable 5 pricing is $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens, exactly 2x Claude Opus 4.8 ($5/$25). Claude Mythos 5 (the restricted Project Glasswing version) has identical pricing. Prompt caching cuts input spend by 90%. Batch API pricing is $5/$25 (50% off). In April 2026, Anthropic announced a model it said was too dangerous to release.

AI spend has no ceiling. An engineer can burn $5,000 in an hour, and a team that spins up an agent on Friday can loop it on a bad prompt all weekend. You find out when the bill lands: the money is already gone, the damage pieced back together from logs. Cloud spend had a natural limit. Tokens don’t. Now you see it as it happens. Connect a source and the calls stream in within seconds. Within minutes they’re broken out by model, provider, agent, and user.

You’ve deployed Karpenter or Cluster Autoscaler and tightened your resource requests, but while you saw an initial dip in your cloud bill, your savings have flatlined. Organizations that thought they had the fundamentals of cloud cost under control are now seeing stagnation. The problem isn’t that they need another FinOps tool or better visibility. The problem is that the current state of enterprise cloud cost optimization strategy is fundamentally reactive.

During the Toronto KCD (Kubernetes Community Days), I attended an insightful talk on AI resource optimization that highlighted a staggering Gartner study: “AI infrastructure is adding $401 billion in new spending this year alone. Yet, real-world audits tell a much darker story, revealing that average GPU utilization in the enterprise is stuck at a dismal 5%”. While many people in the audience were shocked by that number, the data didn’t come as a surprise to us.