Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Visualize branches and commits, manage parallel work and agents, and run your entire Git workflow from one view. AI changed how code gets written. It also changed what developers spend their time doing. Today, developers are reviewing AI-generated changes, coordinating parallel work across branches and worktrees, cleaning up commit history, resolving conflicts, and getting everything ready to merge.

Most companies will tell you they’re customer-obsessed. Fewer can point to the actual mechanism. At GitKraken, it isn’t a quarterly survey or a roadmap council. It’s a Slack channel where developers vent about their Git workflow, and the desktop team is already in there reading it.

The secret sauce that powers Agentic Development Environments (ADEs) like Kepler is a little thing called the Agent Client Protocol (ACP). In this context, Kepler is the Client and harnesses like Claude Code and the Codex CLI are the Agents. We’re going to go over some of the details about how it works, how we use it at GitKraken, and how the protocol may be changing for the better.

Leadership has stopped asking whether your team is using AI. They’re asking what you’re delivering with it. That’s a harder question, because most of the numbers teams have been reporting, adoption rate, seats activated, prompts run, don’t actually answer it.

Adding a second AI agent to a project feels like doubling your output. In practice, it usually means doubling your bookkeeping too. Every agent needs its own worktree so it can work without touching the branch someone else, human or otherwise, is using. Multiply that by five agents across three repos, and the isolation that made parallel work possible starts generating its own kind of work: which worktree goes with which branch, which ones are stale, which upstream nobody remembers creating.

Most teams adopting AI agents are making a bet on which one wins. Claude or Codex, Copilot or something newer next quarter. That bet is the wrong one to make. The agent you use will keep changing. The workflow around it is what actually needs to hold up.

The frontier models have led the pack for a while now. It seems like the big players of Anthropic and OpenAI keep leapfrogging each other by a couple points in benchmark scores every other month. But, a trend we are starting to see is that open weight models are improving by leaps and bounds. They don’t hold the lead and probably won’t for a while, but the fact that open models are scaring the leaders is something to think about.

GitKraken Desktop 12.4 gives developers running several worktrees and AI agent sessions a single graph to see it all, plus an inline way to approve or deny what each agent wants to do. It ships August 4, 2026, with updates carried forward from 12.1 through 12.4.

Every so often we sit down with someone from our support team and turn their week into a blog post. First up: Roberto Vizcarra, on four things generating tickets lately, AI credits, student plans, integrations, and Mac performance. Here’s what changed and what to do about it.

A faster car doesn’t get you home faster if the freeway is still jammed. That is the problem most teams run into once they add a second, third, or fourth AI coding agent to the mix. More agents generate more code. They do not automatically generate more finished work, because someone still has to track which agent is waiting on input, which one just opened a pull request, and which one has been quietly stuck for twenty minutes. Kepler is GitKraken’s answer to that traffic jam.