Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

AI can write code, but how does it do with a large, organically built codebase with years of development? Datadog’s monolithic webapp had significant scale and support challenges, so we knew the time had come to break it up. But when the code has been written, revised and tweaked so many times (as we keep adding new features and capabilities), by so many teams, that becomes much harder.

Datadog has always been driven by a broader vision of helping teams understand and operate complex systems. In this session, you'll hear from Michael Whetten, Senior Vice President of Product Management, and Cansu Berkem, Director of Product Management, as they share the latest updates across the Datadog product suite and discuss how that vision continues to shape the platform's evolution and support the next generation of AI-driven applications.

AI is generating code at 10x human speed, but we’re not shipping software 10x faster. Agents have a quality problem, and we still can’t trust their output without validation. Breaking the code review model didn’t help. So what would it take to autonomously ship code that’s actually trustworthy? Join us to explore what an agentic harness looks like when the SDLC is the harness, a validation system that spans intent, CI, staging, and production, with context flowing bidirectionally between all stages.

Senior engineers are the pillars of SRE programs—not only do they have the leadership to manage incidents well, they also have the tribal knowledge to understand the technical causes of tricky issues. But when the know-how is confined to a few individuals, it greatly limits the effectiveness of your SRE team.

When production breaks, the clues are everywhere but the story is scattered. RUM sessions, APM traces, metrics, and logs allow Datadog to tell you part of the story. What’s missing is your service ownership quirks, your team's conventions, or the three-year-old workaround buried in a comment that explains why a certain endpoint behaves the way it does.

Incident response often spans a patchwork of tools, handoffs, and manual steps. An engineer gets paged, a team investigates the issue, the incident commander coordinates the response, SREs document decisions, and somebody (anybody!) writes the postmortem. Every handoff introduces more context switching, increasing the risk of critical information loss, and ultimately slowing resolution.

New vulnerabilities emerge every day and thousands of endpoints change constantly — it's a continuous race against time. Patching isn't just deployment; it's manual handoffs and incomplete visibility that leave organizations exposed. This video shows how Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management provides immediate, authoritative insights into your IT estate so you can close security gaps faster.