Operations | Monitoring | ITSM | DevOps | Cloud

Ask Claude or Le Chat what is happening on your servers: the Bleemeo MCP server

The first minutes of an incident are spent asking questions a monitoring tool can answer but rarely in the form you asked them: which servers are in trouble right now, is it the same thing as last night, what did memory do on the web servers before it started? Each answer is a few clicks away, on a different page.

Harness AI Agents

AI is writing code faster than ever. But what happens after the code is written? Harness CEO Jyoti Bansal introduces four AI agents built to automate the software delivery lifecycle: Software Delivery Agent – Automate builds, deployments, and infrastructure management. Security Testing Agent – Find, prioritize, and fix vulnerabilities with AI. Runtime Protection Agent – Protect applications, APIs, and AI agents in production.

How we used Agentic Pipelines to turn test coverage into a daily habit

Engineers write tests for the logic that worries them and let the small details slide. One of our commerce engineering teams now has a scheduled agent that finds the thinly tested files, writes the missing tests, and opens a pull request for review. Nobody decides to skip a unit test. The core logic gets covered, the small details don’t make the cut, and most days that’s a fair trade.

ChatGPT Enterprise pricing in 2026: seat costs, minimums, and the new token rate card

ChatGPT Enterprise has no public list price. Reported 2026 contracts average about $60 per user per month within a $45 to $75 range, with 150-seat minimums and annual prepayment, putting the floor near $108,000 a year. Newer eligible agreements add usage-based billing under OpenAI's published token rate card.

Nobody Wants Your New AI Agent #devops #aiagents #softwaredevelopment #techtrends #ai

DevOps customers are rejecting standalone AI agents and web interfaces in favor of integrating context directly into their existing harnesses, such as Copilot or Claude. Rather than logging into separate tools, developers prefer combining models and technologies within a single context window to streamline software development and debugging. Learn more: speedscale.com.

AI wrote the bug. You need production data to reproduce it

A pull request lands with a function an AI assistant generated. It reads cleanly, passes the existing tests, and gets merged. Three weeks later it breaks, but only for accounts with a specific billing history. Nobody wrote a test for that condition because nobody was thinking about it when the code went in. Now someone has to debug logic they didn't reason through, against a failure they can't picture without the exact data that triggered it. Debugging someone else's code has always worked this way.

6 improvements that make Grafana Assistant better at helping your workflows

When you ask Grafana Assistant to build a dashboard or investigate an alert, you're doing so because there's work to be done. To do that work effectively, you need the right data, changes you can inspect, and conclusions supported by evidence. You also want Assistant to avoid mistakes and act quickly. Over the past six months, our team has worked hard to improve what makes those outcomes possible.