Despite there being significant differences in the roles, DevOps and Site Reliability Engineering are often lumped together because many people assume they do similar work. Although both attempt to reduce the issues arising from software development processes, their goals, skill sets, and approaches are actually quite different. DevOps engineers focus on the development pipeline, and their goal is to enable better development processes and workflows.
Incident response refers to effectively responding to infrastructure issues and resolving them in the shortest time frame possible. Due to several loss-inducing high-profile outages over the last few years, organizations have sought to create rigorous processes with specialized tools to resolve incidents quickly and learn from their failures. As one of the first platforms to enter the incident response space, PagerDuty is a dominant player, but over the years, competing platforms have begun carving out their own niche in the incident response space.
Site reliability engineers (SREs) play a crucial role in ensuring the reliability of systems. From creating software to improving system reliability in production, responding to incidents, and fixing issues, SREs are responsible for guaranteeing the health of applications.. And observability helps support SREs'. Because an observable system allows them to identify and fix issues promptly, resulting in SRE's being better equipped to fast-track development cycles.
What can IT teams learn from today’s most successful CEOs? And, perhaps more interestingly, how can IT pros think like a CEO to level up teams across DevOps, SRE and CloudOps? Find out here.
When it comes to building reliable and scalable software, few organizations have as much authority and expertise as Google. Their Site Reliability Engineering Handbook, first published in 2016, details their practices to maintain reliability as Google scaled. But when you have over a million servers running thousands of services across more than twenty data centers, how do you monitor them in a consistent, logical, and relevant way?